Blog - Drug Treatment Center

Could Brain Abnormality Predict Drug Addiction?

Posted on 03 Nov 2008


Scientists at The University of Nottingham are to use MRI technology to discover whether abnormalities in the decision-making part of the brain could make some people more likely to become addicted to drugs.

In a three-year study, funded with £360,000 from the Medical Research Council, Dr Lee Hogarth in the University's School of Psychology will study the impact that an abnormal frontal cortex can have in people's risk of becoming dependant upon drugs such as tobacco, alcohol, cannabis or heroin.

Dr Hogarth said: "Evidence suggests that a large percentage of the population try drugs but only a small proportion of experimental users - roughly about 15 per cent - will make the transition to full-blown addiction.

"Our study will move us a step closer to understanding why some people can use drugs recreationally without becoming hooked, while others will go on to develop clinical dependence."

The research will focus on the frontal cortex, the area of the brain which is involved in decision-making and which allows us to weigh up short term gain with potential long term negative consequences. The researchers believe that some people may have a biological predisposition to becoming addicted because this portion of their brain is malfunctioning, preventing them from appreciating risks adequately, leading them to make poor choices in relation to drug abuse.

Young people may be particularly affected by this as the frontal cortex is not yet fully developed, which may explain many risk-taking behaviours in adolescents.

The research will compare students who report social versus daily smoking, and adult smokers who are dependant on nicotine versus those who are not. These four groups will allow researchers to trace the transition to dependence across the lifetime of drug use.

In the experiments, volunteers will first learn to earn cigarettes before this behaviour is punished with an unpleasant noise. The question is whether nicotine dependence is associated with a persistence in cigarette seeking despite the negative consequence of this behaviour, which is the clinical hallmark of addiction.

In addition, researchers will use MRI technology to measure abnormal brain activity in participants who persist in drug seeking, despite this behaviour being punished.

Dr Hogarth commented: "The risk of becoming addicted is due to a failure to offset the anticipated pleasure from drug use with knowledge of the long term negative consequences. The frontal cortex carries signals for anticipated pleasure and pain, so we expect to see an abnormality in the integration of these signals in dependent addicts who persist in punished drug seeking behaviour.

"There is currently a debate as to whether addicts are responsible for their addictive behaviour, which has implications for the funding of their healthcare and treatment. If our hypothesis proves correct, we would argue that addicts are intentionally choosing to take drugs, rather than being controlled, like robots, by urges beyond their control. However, this does not mean that addicts are morally culpable for their choices, because they cannot help being vulnerable to a distortion of the neural system that computes their choices.

"If we identify those who possess this vulnerability, perhaps more can be done to prevent them from making the transition to pathological addiction."


AddThis Feed Button Bookmark and Share

back to top

Symptoms of Alcohol Withdrawal

Posted on 21 Oct 2008


Source: National Institutes of Health

Withdrawals Can Be Mild, Moderate or Severe
Alcohol withdrawal refers to a group of symptoms that may occur from suddenly stopping the use of alcohol after chronic or prolonged ingestion.

Not everyone who stops drinking experiences withdrawal symptoms, but most people who have been drinking for a long period of time, or drinking frequently, or drink heavily when they do drink, will experience some form of withdrawal symptoms if they stop drinking suddenly.

There is no way to predict how any individual will respond to quitting. If you plan to stop drinking and you have been drinking for years, or if you drink heavily when you do drink, or even if you drink moderately but frequently, you should consult a medical professional before going "cold turkey."

Withdrawal Symptoms:
Mild to moderate psychological symptoms:
Feeling of jumpiness or nervousness
Feeling of shakiness
Anxiety
Irritability or easily excited
Emotional volatility, rapid emotional changes
Depression
Fatigue
Difficulty with thinking clearly
Bad dreams

Mild to moderate physical symptoms:
Headache - general, pulsating
Sweating, especially the palms of the hands or the face
Nausea
Vomiting
Loss of appetite
Insomnia, sleeping difficulty
Paleness
Rapid heart rate (palpitations)
Eyes, pupils different size (enlarged, dilated pupils)
Skin, clammy
Abnormal movements
Tremor of the hands
Involuntary, abnormal movements of the eyelids

Severe symptoms:
A state of confusion and hallucinations (visual) -- known as delirium tremens
Agitation
Fever
Convulsions
"Black outs" -- when the person forgets what happened during the drinking episode

Liver Patients Offered a Lifeline
Jo Revill, Health Editor
Observer (London)
Sunday, January 2, 2005

The increasing number of middle-aged patients with chronic liver disease caused by heavy drinking is forcing doctors to look at new ways of saving their lives.

A pioneering trial to help seriously ill people will begin this month, using the patient's own cells to regenerate the organ. By injecting patients with their own stem cells, the basic 'building blocks' for all kinds of cells, doctors hope that the liver can regrow itself to a point where the organ starts to work again.

The trial is experimental, but follows other work which shows that stem cells have helped patients with heart failure. The dire shortage of donor organs for transplant has encouraged the specialists to think of new ways of helping patients who otherwise have a very bleak future.

One in 20 people in Britain is now dependent on alcohol and a similar number are at serious risk of liver disease. Physicians and government experts have warned that alcohol-related harm - severe liver disease and injuries caused by drink-related violence - are on the rise as the nation's drinking habits become heavier.

Deaths from liver disease in patients under 50 have risen sevenfold in the past 30 years and surgeons have warned they are seeing a growing number of patients with cirrhosis of the liver, a condition where the healthy liver tissue is gradually replaced by scarred, useless tissue. The disease is insidious, because apparently healthy people may have it without knowing and the first signs do not occur until a late stage of the disease.

When alcohol is drunk, it is quickly absorbed and passes in the bloodstream to the liver, where it can cause excessive fat to be deposited within the liver cells. Between 20 and 30 per cent of those who drink heavily beyond the initial stages of liver damage will develop alcoholic hepatitis, a condition which can be fatal. A smaller number, about 10 per cent, go on to develop cirrhosis. Although alcohol is the leading cause of cirrhosis, it can also be brought on by forms of hepatitis or by some toxic chemicals.

Scientists at Imperial College London believe stem cell therapy holds out enormous hope for those who need new organs. Professor Nagy Habib, head of liver surgery at London's Hammersmith Hospital, who is running the trial, said: 'The liver is a wonderful organ in the way it can regenerate itself, but if there is a lot of damage it stops functioning properly. If we can get 15 to 20 per cent of the organ regenerated, then that is enough to really improve the patient's condition. These cells seem to have the fantastic ability to become whatever is needed in order to repair the damage.'

By injecting the patient's own stem cells, taken from their blood, directly into the bloodstream, the researchers hope they may be able to improve the function of the liver by getting the stem cells to repopulate the liver.

The procedure, known as leukapheris, involves taking blood from a patient and then separating it into its component parts. The stem cells are taken from the white blood cells, while the red blood cells are returned to the body through the arm. Habib and his team then inject the stem cells into the hepatic artery, the vessel which goes into the liver.

Habib believes they have to look at all the potential cures. There are about 700 liver transplants in the UK each year, but 7,500 die annually from liver disease. Alcohol is the major reason for a transplant, followed by the virus hepatitis C. 'The demand for a transplant has really risen,' said Habib. 'We don't have the equivalent of a kidney dialysis machine for these patients, so unfortunately most of them will die while waiting for an organ.'

It is not yet known how many stem cells may be needed for the trial to succeed. The worse the patient's liver function, the more cells may be necessary. 'If you can provide 1 per cent of liver cell mass, and then allow that 1 per cent to grow over a three-month period, it's possible that the liver will have enough healthy cells to behave properly, and start to produce what it needs,' said Habib.

Like many specialists, he worries that people do not understand the damage that can be done by heavy, prolonged drinking. 'If people could see what life was like in the final stages of liver failure, they might think seriously about giving up at a much earlier point,' he said. 'The liver is a very forgiving organ, but there's a limit to how much alcohol it can process before the damage sets in.'

 

AddThis Feed Button Bookmark and Share

back to top

Medication & Therapy for Alcohol Recovery

Posted on 21 Oct 2008


By Lloyd Vacovsky

The millennium has signaled the dawn of a new era in the treatment of alcohol and substance dependence in the United States. New treatment protocols, which include pharmacotherapy, are attracting increased attention from the Alcohol and Substance Dependence Treatment Community. At the forefront of this movement is The Pennsylvania Model of Recovery, which is so named in that its protocols are based on the research and work of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Treatment Research Center in Philadelphia. This is a medical model, which offers a full range of empirically tested treatment options to individuals dependent upon alcohol and other drugs. The Pennsylvania Model differs dramatically from the Minnesota Model or 12 Step format in that it wholeheartedly embraces Pharmacotherapy as a cornerstone of treatment, along with individual and group psychosocial support.

The Pennsylvania Model can be compared to a three-legged stool. The three legs are the biological, psychological and social components of recovery. All three components are essential. Take away one of the legs, and the stool becomes ineffective. The Pennsylvania Model seeks to address each of these components of addiction, for individuals seeking recovery.

The biological component includes not only the physical addiction to the alcohol or drug, as manifested for example by the presence of "the Shakes", but also the intense cravings that persist long after the physical discomfort have dissipated. Most people can deal with the physical discomfort. It is the emotional issues caused by imbalances in the brain chemistry that precipitate most relapses. Relapses are common, indeed expected. This despite the dire consequences that many individuals face by their continued drinking. Social and non-drinkers do not understand what drives an alcohol dependent individual to drink alcohol, without regard to consequences. A simple explanation is that it can be said that an alcohol dependent person does not drink to feel "good" but rather drinks in order to not feel "bad". The use of safe, effective, approved medications addresses the biological component of the recovery process.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is utilized for the psychological issues which must also be addressed. Recovery is at best an extremely difficult path. Being burdened by such issues as clinical depression makes it all but impossible to achieve abstinence. The use of alcohol is clearly the most common form of self-medication utilized by individuals suffering from psychological trauma. Simply stopping the alcohol consumption for example, in most situations, will not eliminate depression or any other psychological symptom. Using depression as an example, many individuals simply do not understand that they are suffering from depression. Depression for them, over the years, becomes the "norm". They have forgotten the difference between feeling good and feeling bad. For most alcohol dependent individuals, feeling "bad" is the "norm" and alcohol is their only known form of relief.

Equally important are the social issues faced by individuals in recovery. Learning how to adjust to sobriety is often more difficult than making the decision to stop. Dealing sober with family, friends and employers can be so intimidating to individuals in recovery that many relapse. Alcohol dependent individuals over the years become extremely skillful in manipulating situations and lying in order to insure a supply of alcohol. The "news" that one has made a commitment to stop drinking is most often met with justifiable skepticism. The individual has probably given the news about stopping the drinking so often that listeners react much as those who heard the warning from "the boy crying wolf". Support from concerned family and friends is essential to recovery, yet the bridge has been burned so badly, that such support is no longer offered.

Alcohol dependent individuals often experience intense isolation and loneliness, even when surrounded by family and friends. Often they do not realize or are in denial as to the impact that their drinking has on the people around them. As with most addicted individuals, alcoholics tend to rely on their own ability to control their addiction. The end result is usually another failed attempt to achieve sobriety. Most individuals seeking help do so only after disastrous events have compelled them to do so. For recovery to become possible, numerous issues as discussed must be addressed. In the end, it is critical for the individual to realize that the help of others is a vital component of recovery.


On December 30, 1994, the United States Food & Drug Administration approved for use in the treatment of alcohol dependence, the opioid antagonist Naltrexone HCI. The approval of naltrexone marked a turning point in the history of treatment for alcohol dependence. Naltrexone is at the forefront of emerging pharmacotherapy protocols utilized by the Pennsylvania Model. Since the approval of naltrexone in 1994, additional medications have been added to the arsenal in the battle against alcohol dependence. These medications include Ondansetron, Campral and Topamax.

Within a few minutes of ingestion, Naltrexone will dramatically reduce or suppress the intense craving to consume alcohol. The medication is extremely safe, has very minor or no side effects, is not addicting either physically or emotionally, can be discontinued at anytime without adverse effects and is generally administered for six months or less.

It is clear neither that Naltrexone, nor any of the other effective medications, in themselves are a cure for alcohol dependence. They are not magic nor are they the silver bullet that will destroy this disease known as alcoholism. They are however, extremely valuable tools, that when properly utilized, will enable motivated individuals to embark upon a successful path to recovery.

The primary difficulty with medications such as Naltrexone is that they only addresse specific issues of a very complicated disease. Naltrexone will effectively suppress the cravings, however it does not address any of the remaining issues for example clinical depression and or social problems which in themselves can cause relapse. It does however create a window of opportunity in which an alcohol dependent individual can address the countless issues of maintaining sobriety, without the overwhelming desire to drink alcohol. Even with the use of naltrexone, the path to recovery is at best difficult.

Alcohol can be compared to a sandbox. Consuming alcohol enables individuals to stick their head in the sand and avoid issues and problems. The problems, the pain, do not go away. They simply lurk in the background, waiting for the individual to attempt to get their head out of the sand. Relapse occurs when the individual is not able to deal with the intense cravings, coupled with their inability to face the almost countless lurking demons that exist in everyday living. Medications effectively take away the sandbox, forcing the individual to address the numerous issues that occur during the recovery process.

Individuals that have "a Life" but cannot get past the cravings in their efforts to abstain from alcohol find Naltrexone "a wonder drug". Generally, within an hour, the monkey that has been on their back for years, jumps off, and does not return if the medication is taken for the recommended period of time. It is rare however for an individual that is alcohol dependent not to have numerous and severe issues which effect recovery. Individuals with more intense issues are far more likely to slip or relapse.

Again, it must remember that the Naltrexone only addresses the cravings. Years of drinking are not washed away by the taking of a pill. Perhaps the most difficult part of recovery is learning how to be happy. Just as the bottom line of a business is profit, the bottom line of recovery is happiness and contentment. The individual must further recognize that happiness and contentment are not always available to us 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. That we have good days and bad days, and that the sandbox is not the answer for the bad days.

Minnesota Model protocols expect failure, over and over, until the individual has bottomed out. Then, out of desperation, the individual is expected to rebuild a life that the bottle took years to destroy. A Pennsylvania Model program does not expect the individual to fail. This does not mean that failures do not occur. The lure of the sandbox and all the lurking demons often overwhelm the individual. However, by properly addressing the Biological, Psychological and Social issues, the sandbox can be filled with concrete, never again to be used in desperation.

 

AddThis Feed Button Bookmark and Share

back to top

Cocaine-induced Brain Plasticity May Protect The Addicted Brain: Findings May Lead To New Drug-abuse Treatments

Posted on 17 Oct 2008


Increased connections among brain cells caused by excessive drug use may represent the body’s defense mechanism to combat addiction and related behaviors, scientists at UT Southwestern Medical Center have concluded.

Previous studies have shown that repeated use of drugs such as cocaine, amphetamines and nicotine increase the number of anatomical structures called dendritic spines in brain regions associated with pleasure and reward. These dendritic spines represent sites where brain cells communicate with one another. Many scientists believe that this long-lasting brain rewiring underlies the similarly persistent behaviors of drug-taking and drug-seeking associated with addiction and relapse. The mechanism that controls this brain rewiring, however, and its relationship to addiction-related behaviors were previously unknown.

In a study appearing in the Aug. 28 issue of Neuron, researchers found that cocaine suppresses the activity of the protein MEF2 in mice. Because MEF2 normally reduces the number of brain connections, suppressing MEF2 leads to an increase in dendritic spine density. The researchers also found that when they enhanced MEF2 activity in the brain this blocked the drug-induced increase in dendritic spine density and increased addiction-related behavioral responses to cocaine.

“Our findings suggest that increased brain connections during chronic drug use may actually limit behavioral changes associated with drug addiction, rather than support them,” said Dr. Christopher Cowan, assistant professor of psychiatry at UT Southwestern and senior author of the study.

Researchers said they hope this finding could lead to a pharmaceutical treatment for addiction.

“Relapse, or the resumption of active drug-taking and drug-seeking, is very common in drug addicts,” Dr. Cowan said. “Addiction-related brain changes and behaviors seem to be hardwired and semipermanent, and there are limited treatment options. Our data suggest that rather than trying to block the process of increasing dendritic spine density, we may actually want to look at treatments that try to enhance this process.”

MEF2 is activated in response to brain activity. It provides negative feedback to eliminate the potential growth of too many communication sites between nerve cells. Repeated exposure to cocaine disrupts this function of MEF2, resulting in new brain connections.

To investigate the relationship between MEF2 and spine-density changes, the researchers varied the level of the protein in an area of the brain called the nucleus accumbens. This region is associated with the feelings of reward that drug addicts seek. Brain imaging done after mice were given cocaine showed that cocaine stopped MEF2 from limiting dendritic spine increases.

To test MEF2’s relationship to behavior, researchers monitored the movement of mice after repeated daily exposure to the same amount of cocaine. This same dose of cocaine produced a larger behavioral response after repeated days of drug injections, resulting in a “sensitized” response. This sensitized behavioral response to the drug is very stable, lasting for many months after the drug is discontinued.

When the researchers manipulated animals so that their MEF2 levels remained high in the presence of cocaine, the animals were more sensitive to the drug. This suggested that increased communication sites might help combat the addiction process.

“This suggests the exciting possibility that MEF2 proteins may control expression of key genes that modulate drug-related brain changes and behavior,” Dr. Cowan said. “If we understand which genes are influenced by MEF2, we can intervene and try to help the system resist or reverse these sensitization processes.”

In 2006, 23.6 million people ages 12 and older needed treatment for drug or alcohol abuse, according to a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration survey. Substance abuse costs the U.S. more than half a trillion dollars annually, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Future research will focus on determining MEF2 target genes and exploring drug-related density changes in other regions of the brain associated with addiction, Dr. Cowan said.

Other UT Southwestern researchers involved in the study were Dr. Suprabha Pulipparacharuvil, instructor of psychiatry; William Renthal, graduate student in psychiatry and neuroscience; Carly Hale, research technician in psychiatry; Dr. Makoto Taniguchi, postdoctoral researcher in psychiatry; Colleen Dewey, graduate student in neuroscience; Dr. Scott Russo, assistant instructor of psychiatry; Dr. Devanjan Sikder, instructor of internal medicine; and Dr. Guanghua Xiao, assistant professor of clinical sciences. Dr. Eric Nestler, former chairman of psychiatry, and former instructor Dr. Arvind Kumar were also involved. Researchers from Yale and Rockefeller University also participated.

The work was funded by the Whitehall Foundation, the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute of Mental Health.

 

AddThis Feed Button Bookmark and Share

back to top

'He has a disease, just like cancer': David Hasselhoff's wife reveals how his wild drinking wrecked their marriage

Posted on 13 Oct 2008


'He has a disease, just like cancer': David Hasselhoff's wife reveals how his wild drinking wrecked their marriage

By Caroline Graham
Last updated at 9:06 AM on 05th October 2008

Slumped in front of an empty minibar in an anonymous hotel room, David Hasselhoff somehow managed to concentrate for long enough to phone home.

‘I’m drunk and I think I’m dying,’ the veteran star of Baywatch and Knight Rider slurred to his wife. Then the line went dead.

It was June 2002 and for Pamela Bach Hasselhoff the call came like a hammer blow. ‘It was only two days after I had dropped him off at the Betty Ford Centre in Palm Springs,’ she says with tears welling in her eyes. ‘After years of drinking, he’d finally admitted he had a problem and had agreed to go into rehab. It had all been such a huge relief. But then I got that phone call.

‘I called the clinic and discovered he had checked out. I knew I had to go to him. I chartered a private plane and flew from LA to Palm Springs.’ Pamela learned that David had been taken to a local hospital, but didn’t know which one. ‘I got into a taxi and went to every hospital until I found him.’

She discovered later that he’d drunk the entire contents of the minibar and had been found by a maid, semi-conscious and half-naked on the floor. The police had been called. This sordid episode, like so many before, was covered up by Pamela and a team of minders. Hasselhoff was, after all, America’s most bankable TV star at the time.

‘Had news leaked out, it would have destroyed the image he created for himself and the image I created for my friends and family,’ says Pamela. ‘We were both living a lie but the biggest tragedy was that David loved the bottle more than me.’

To his fans – and he has thousands of them in Britain – David Hasselhoff is simply ‘The Hoff’, a  perma-tanned hunk of Hollywood beefcake.

He shot to fame in the Eighties as crime-fighter Michael Knight in the cult series Knight Rider, starring alongside a talking super-powered car called Kitt. But he is most famous, of course, for his starring role in Baywatch – the all-action series that followed the adventures of the muscled-up boys and gorgeous girls who made up a team of LA beach lifeguards.

With ratings boosted by swimsuit-clad co-stars such as Pamela Anderson, the series became, according to Guinness World Records, the most watched in TV history with 1.1billion viewers in 140 countries.

Even when the starring acting roles dried up ten years ago, Hasselhoff managed to reinvent himself thanks to his self-deprecating charm and an ability, rare among Hollywood stars, to appear not to take himself too seriously.

To the woman who recently divorced him, however, Hasselhoff’s image as a self-aware, post-modern celebrity is a sham. ‘David is a falling-down drunk and I covered up for him for years,’ Pamela says. ‘Alcoholism destroys you whether you are a regular Joe or the biggest star on the planet.’

Today, Pamela sits in the sun-dappled garden of the former family home and nervously plays with a packet of Marlboro Lights as five dogs and two cats roam around her. The £3.2million white-painted mansion in the well-heeled LA suburb of Encino is now on the market since the decree absolute came through last month.

She appears to be exhausted after Hasselhoff v Hasselhoff became one of the nastiest divorce battles Hollywood has seen in recent years. Ever since the relationship began to disintegrate there have been lurid claims and counter-claims of drug abuse, drunkenness and physical violence.

There were leaked court papers in which Hasselhoff countered his wife’s sworn deposition that he broke her nose during a drunken row with the words: ‘The only person who broke my wife’s nose was her plastic surgeon.’

Then, mysteriously, video footage appeared on the internet showing a massively intoxicated Hasselhoff trying to eat a hamburger while one of his teenage daughters pleads with him to stop drinking.

Pamela, meanwhile, was vilified as a gold-digger with designs on Hasselhoff’s £25million fortune. It is an accusation she angrily rejects, pointing out that she was happily married to Hasselhoff for many years, is mother to his two daughters, Taylor Ann, 18, and Hayley, 16, and gave up her career to run the family home while he was the main breadwinner.

Blonde, trim and strikingly attractive, Pamela, 44, says: ‘I wanted to be the perfect wife and the perfect mother. I ran a house with five staff, had dinner parties, dressed beautifully, was a member of the PTA, ran dance classes and did all the after-school things. When David didn’t feel well I would stroke his hair and make him hot tea with honey and tell him everything would be OK.’

She is immaculate in skin-tight black jeans, a revealing lime green blouse and heels. Her make-up, carefully applied for our photoshoot, is perfect. As our  four-hour conversation progresses, it becomes clear that she still has deep feelings for Hasselhoff. Indeed, it was her devotion to him that made his career and – some would say – his covert alcoholism possible.

At first, says Pamela, he covered up his problem drinking, caused, she believes, by deep-rooted insecurity, anger and unhappiness. His father, Joe, now in teetotal retirement in California, had been an alcoholic.

‘I never really noticed when we were dating,’ she says. ‘But when we married, it was clear David was drinking a lot. He couldn’t hide it. He is fundamentally unhappy even though there’s no real reason for his unhappiness.

‘David wanted to come home from work, have dinner with the children and then relax. I looked after him. He was my baby. I knew he liked a drink at night, so I would set my alarm to get him up in the morning and ready for work by the time the car from the studio arrived.

‘Did I know he had a drinking problem? Yes, probably. But I protected him and our children because that was my job. He provided for us and I saw my role as making his life as easy as possible. I know he loved me.’

Despite his popularity, Hasselhoff had few friends and often drank alone.

‘The drinking got worse,’ says Pamela. ‘He went from social drinking to getting sick. With an alcoholic, you never know where that first glass of wine will end up. Sometimes they can drink normally and stop after dinner. Other days, one glass goes on to a three-day binge.

‘I would cover for him with the Baywatch producers if he was late getting to work. Sometimes I would get up in the middle of the night and find him passed out on the sofa. Other times he would say cruel things and we’d start rowing and the girls would hear.

‘Everybody thought he was the golden star in swimming trunks on the beach with Pamela Anderson but the drink was taking over his life. To me, he was the man who fell over on the bedroom floor.’

At this point she catches herself. ‘I don’t want this to be an attack on David. I love him. I always have. He’s a good man. He’s tried desperately hard to get sober. But he’s an alcoholic. He has a disease, just like cancer. And just like cancer, it ate away at our family from the inside.’

She refuses to elaborate on stories about his violent outbursts except to acknowledge they happened. ‘I can’t tell you the truth about the nose-breaking incident. It would destroy David and I can’t do that.

‘What I can say is that I went from having two children to having three. I looked after David and he liked being looked after. He could come home, turn on the television and be himself. And he could drink.’

She says their life together was based around the home, and the Hasselhoff family house is surprisingly homely – though there are now few signs that The Hoff ever lived there. Pamela points out a prized antique music box she and David bought during a trip to Germany and a magnificent gilt mirror above the fireplace that was bought in Louisiana. There is a cream baby grand piano in the living room where he used to serenade her with love songs.

The detritus of the divorce – the final financial settlement is yet to be thrashed out – is, however, clear to see. The guest room is filled with dozens of boxes of paperwork and in Pamela’s bedroom, boxes full of legal files are stacked up in one corner opposite the four-poster marital bed.

It is clear that it’s the gold-digger jibe that most hurts her. Given her humble background, it is, perhaps, easy to see why. She was born in small-town Tulsa, Oklahoma, to a mother who married and divorced four times. She was a 17-year-old high school cheerleader with a head stuffed full of Hollywood dreams when she dropped out of school and drove to Los Angeles with a girlfriend in 1982.

She was taken on by the Ford Model Agency but her height – she is 5ft 5in – and pretty, girl-next-door looks meant she was directed towards catalogues and knitting patterns rather than the catwalks of Paris and Milan.

Pamela says: ‘I was the girl on the paper wrap on the outside of a ball of wool. I was very good at it.’ She began landing bit-parts in television shows including Knight Rider, Cheers and Baywatch.

‘The first time I met David was on Knight Rider in 1986,’ she says. ‘I got a message from the assistant director saying, “David would like to see you in his trailer.” I declined because he was still married (to actress Caroline Hickland, who had also appeared in Knight Rider). I don’t think many girls in my position would have turned him down. He was a big star.’

They met again on the set of Baywatch in 1989, the year Hasselhoff and Hickland divorced. Pamela says: ‘I was an extra. We went out for dinner and he invited me to Hawaii. I knew what that meant. I told him he’d have to woo me if he wanted me.’

By Hollywood standards, Hasselhoff obliged. The pair dated for nine months before Pamela fell pregnant. She laughs nervously: ‘We were in love, we truly were. But, of course, me being pregnant brought the wedding forward a bit.’

At first, married life was ‘blissful’, Pamela says. ‘We were never into the whole Hollywood scene. David had been around and I’d had my fair share of boyfriends so neither of us felt like we were missing out.’ They bought the big home in Encino, had their two daughters and as Hasselhoff’s career took off, she says the marriage was happy, despite his chronic drinking.

She was able to contain his drinking until a terrible motorcycle crash in February 2003 fundamentally altered the balance in their relationship.

The couple were returning home from lunch in Santa Monica when Hasselhoff’s custom-built Harley-Davidson motorcycle veered off the road. Pamela was a pillion passenger. ‘I can’t tell you if he’d been drinking. I remember nothing except waking up in hospital,’ she says. Hasselhoff escaped with minor injuries. Pamela was thrown from the bike and seriously injured. She was in hospital for two months, needed 17 operations and had two steel rods and 27 screws in her left leg.

‘When I got out of hospital, I was on prescribed painkillers. I spent a year in bed. Later, David’s lawyers used this in the divorce to say I became a drug addict. I had been the glue that held the family together and suddenly Mummy was sick. David tried to be supportive but he got bored of me being ill. He needed to be looked after but I wasn’t capable. We started drifting apart. He would either go out or sit downstairs and drink.’

She doesn’t believe he was unfaithful. ‘I know he got constant offers. But I also know David. He always chooses the booze. Even if he wanted to, he couldn’t.’

Bizarrely, Pamela claims their split happened ‘by accident’ after she and Hasselhoff went on what was supposed to be a romantic break to Cabo San Lucas in Mexico in December 2005 to celebrate her recovery. ‘David went on a four-day bender. I wanted him to love me but instead he drank and told me he hated me. I went home early.’

At this, Pamela breaks down weeping. She claims she asked Hasselhoff’s business adviser for the name of a lawyer so she could discuss ‘her options’. When she arrived at the lawyer’s office, her cellphone was ringing. ‘It was David. He said, “I know you’re at the lawyer’s. I am going to file for divorce.” Then the nightmare began.’

Of course, there are two sides to every story and Hasselhoff’s publicists issue elaborate explanations for his sometimes ‘eccentric’ behaviour – on one occasion he was refused permission to board a plane at Heathrow and on another managed to cut himself on a chandelier in a bathroom of a London hotel.

Pamela shrugs her shoulders and says: ‘People are still covering up for him. I don’t believe this divorce would have got nasty if David hadn’t been so vulnerable. He’s angry at me for going to the lawyer but I also think a lot of people have taken advantage of him because he’s a drinker.

‘At the end of our marriage he kept telling me how unhappy he was. But if he’s disappointed by life, so am I. The man I fell in love with disappeared in the bottom of a glass.

‘He would drink and I couldn’t reason with him. He passed out, he would urinate on himself. He’d become violent. He would become verbally aggressive. When we would get photographed for People magazine looking shiny and lovely, David would be drunk. When the photographer left, the real David would emerge. It was like Jekyll and Hyde.

‘The girls know what went on. They know what is going on now. They love their dad and they love me. David is renting a place in Bel Air now. One of my girls said to me the other night, “Dad’s lonely.” It broke my heart. But I also know the bitterness we’ve had between each other has gone too far.

‘What I will say is that he’s a fantastic father. He has always been there for our girls. He came to the hospital immediately after Hayley was involved in a minor car accident last week.

‘David and I will always be a part of each other’s lives. I see him and I worry. He’s very thin now. No one is looking after him. I know he is drinking but no one cares whether he is eating or not.’

She walks around the marital home pointing out the peeling paint and chipped marble and says: ‘This is a house that needs a man. David was the man, then he became the man who could pay for things. Now everything he and I worked for is for sale. It’s a sad story.

‘I always believed in happy Hollywood endings but our story doesn’t have one. And that’s the truth.’

 

 

AddThis Feed Button Bookmark and Share

back to top

<< Previous 1 2 3 Next >>

 

You may contact us using our online form below:

Search

Google is our preferred powerful search engine for google's best drug rehabs

Picture Gallery

Click on a picture to view full-size:

Helpful Links

Other Resources

Links:
- Alcoholics Anonymous
- AA Orange County
- Narcotics Anonymous
- Cocaine Anonymous
- CA Orange County
- Al-Anon/Alateen
- Al-Anon Orange County
- HOW Hall Huntington Beach

Telephone Numbers:
- AA Orange County:
(714) 556-4555
- NA Orange County:
(714) 776-8581
- CA Orange County:
(949) 650-1011
- Al-Anon Orange County:
(714) 748-1113

Add URL Free Directory

New York DUI
Here at DUIFoundation.org, we hope to reinforce the ideal that a single drunk driving accident can permanently have a negative impact on you, passengers in your vehicle, and anyone else involved in the disaster (drivers and passengers in other automobiles and even pedestrians)