Blog - Drug Rehab Center
Symptoms of Alcohol Withdrawal
Posted on 21 Oct 2008
Source:
National Institutes of HealthWithdrawals Can Be Mild, Moderate or Severe
Alcohol withdrawal refers to a group of symptoms that may occur from suddenly stopping the use of alcohol after chronic or prolonged ingestion.
Not everyone who stops drinking experiences withdrawal symptoms, but most people who have been drinking for a long period of time, or drinking frequently, or drink heavily when they do drink, will experience some form of withdrawal symptoms if they stop drinking suddenly.
There is no way to predict how any individual will respond to quitting. If you plan to stop drinking and you have been drinking for years, or if you drink heavily when you do drink, or even if you drink moderately but frequently, you should consult a medical professional before going "cold turkey."
Withdrawal Symptoms:
Mild to moderate psychological symptoms:
Feeling of jumpiness or nervousness
Feeling of shakiness
Anxiety
Irritability or easily excited
Emotional volatility, rapid emotional changes
Depression
Fatigue
Difficulty with thinking clearly
Bad dreams
Mild to moderate physical symptoms:
Headache - general, pulsating
Sweating, especially the palms of the hands or the face
Nausea
Vomiting
Loss of appetite
Insomnia, sleeping difficulty
Paleness
Rapid heart rate (palpitations)
Eyes, pupils different size (enlarged, dilated pupils)
Skin, clammy
Abnormal movements
Tremor of the hands
Involuntary, abnormal movements of the eyelids
Severe symptoms:
A state of confusion and hallucinations (visual) -- known as delirium tremens
Agitation
Fever
Convulsions
"Black outs" -- when the person forgets what happened during the drinking episode
Liver Patients Offered a Lifeline
Jo Revill, Health Editor
Observer (London)
Sunday, January 2, 2005
The increasing number of middle-aged patients with chronic liver disease caused by heavy drinking is forcing doctors to look at new ways of saving their lives.
A pioneering trial to help seriously ill people will begin this month, using the patient's own cells to regenerate the organ. By injecting patients with their own stem cells, the basic 'building blocks' for all kinds of cells, doctors hope that the liver can regrow itself to a point where the organ starts to work again.
The trial is experimental, but follows other work which shows that stem cells have helped patients with heart failure. The dire shortage of donor organs for transplant has encouraged the specialists to think of new ways of helping patients who otherwise have a very bleak future.
One in 20 people in Britain is now dependent on alcohol and a similar number are at serious risk of liver disease. Physicians and government experts have warned that alcohol-related harm - severe liver disease and injuries caused by drink-related violence - are on the rise as the nation's drinking habits become heavier.
Deaths from liver disease in patients under 50 have risen sevenfold in the past 30 years and surgeons have warned they are seeing a growing number of patients with cirrhosis of the liver, a condition where the healthy liver tissue is gradually replaced by scarred, useless tissue. The disease is insidious, because apparently healthy people may have it without knowing and the first signs do not occur until a late stage of the disease.
When alcohol is drunk, it is quickly absorbed and passes in the bloodstream to the liver, where it can cause excessive fat to be deposited within the liver cells. Between 20 and 30 per cent of those who drink heavily beyond the initial stages of liver damage will develop alcoholic hepatitis, a condition which can be fatal. A smaller number, about 10 per cent, go on to develop cirrhosis. Although alcohol is the leading cause of cirrhosis, it can also be brought on by forms of hepatitis or by some toxic chemicals.
Scientists at Imperial College London believe stem cell therapy holds out enormous hope for those who need new organs. Professor Nagy Habib, head of liver surgery at London's Hammersmith Hospital, who is running the trial, said: 'The liver is a wonderful organ in the way it can regenerate itself, but if there is a lot of damage it stops functioning properly. If we can get 15 to 20 per cent of the organ regenerated, then that is enough to really improve the patient's condition. These cells seem to have the fantastic ability to become whatever is needed in order to repair the damage.'
By injecting the patient's own stem cells, taken from their blood, directly into the bloodstream, the researchers hope they may be able to improve the function of the liver by getting the stem cells to repopulate the liver.
The procedure, known as leukapheris, involves taking blood from a patient and then separating it into its component parts. The stem cells are taken from the white blood cells, while the red blood cells are returned to the body through the arm. Habib and his team then inject the stem cells into the hepatic artery, the vessel which goes into the liver.
Habib believes they have to look at all the potential cures. There are about 700 liver transplants in the UK each year, but 7,500 die annually from liver disease. Alcohol is the major reason for a transplant, followed by the virus hepatitis C. 'The demand for a transplant has really risen,' said Habib. 'We don't have the equivalent of a kidney dialysis machine for these patients, so unfortunately most of them will die while waiting for an organ.'
It is not yet known how many stem cells may be needed for the trial to succeed. The worse the patient's liver function, the more cells may be necessary. 'If you can provide 1 per cent of liver cell mass, and then allow that 1 per cent to grow over a three-month period, it's possible that the liver will have enough healthy cells to behave properly, and start to produce what it needs,' said Habib.
Like many specialists, he worries that people do not understand the damage that can be done by heavy, prolonged drinking. 'If people could see what life was like in the final stages of liver failure, they might think seriously about giving up at a much earlier point,' he said. 'The liver is a very forgiving organ, but there's a limit to how much alcohol it can process before the damage sets in.'
Medication & Therapy for Alcohol Recovery
Posted on 21 Oct 2008
By Lloyd Vacovsky
The millennium has signaled the dawn of a new era in the treatment of alcohol and substance dependence in the United States. New treatment protocols, which include pharmacotherapy, are attracting increased attention from the Alcohol and Substance Dependence Treatment Community. At the forefront of this movement is The Pennsylvania Model of Recovery, which is so named in that its protocols are based on the research and work of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Treatment Research Center in Philadelphia. This is a medical model, which offers a full range of empirically tested treatment options to individuals dependent upon alcohol and other drugs. The Pennsylvania Model differs dramatically from the Minnesota Model or 12 Step format in that it wholeheartedly embraces Pharmacotherapy as a cornerstone of treatment, along with individual and group psychosocial support.
The Pennsylvania Model can be compared to a three-legged stool. The three legs are the biological, psychological and social components of recovery. All three components are essential. Take away one of the legs, and the stool becomes ineffective. The Pennsylvania Model seeks to address each of these components of addiction, for individuals seeking recovery.
The biological component includes not only the physical addiction to the alcohol or drug, as manifested for example by the presence of "the Shakes", but also the intense cravings that persist long after the physical discomfort have dissipated. Most people can deal with the physical discomfort. It is the emotional issues caused by imbalances in the brain chemistry that precipitate most relapses. Relapses are common, indeed expected. This despite the dire consequences that many individuals face by their continued drinking. Social and non-drinkers do not understand what drives an alcohol dependent individual to drink alcohol, without regard to consequences. A simple explanation is that it can be said that an alcohol dependent person does not drink to feel "good" but rather drinks in order to not feel "bad". The use of safe, effective, approved medications addresses the biological component of the recovery process.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is utilized for the psychological issues which must also be addressed. Recovery is at best an extremely difficult path. Being burdened by such issues as clinical depression makes it all but impossible to achieve abstinence. The use of alcohol is clearly the most common form of self-medication utilized by individuals suffering from psychological trauma. Simply stopping the alcohol consumption for example, in most situations, will not eliminate depression or any other psychological symptom. Using depression as an example, many individuals simply do not understand that they are suffering from depression. Depression for them, over the years, becomes the "norm". They have forgotten the difference between feeling good and feeling bad. For most alcohol dependent individuals, feeling "bad" is the "norm" and alcohol is their only known form of relief.
Equally important are the social issues faced by individuals in recovery. Learning how to adjust to sobriety is often more difficult than making the decision to stop. Dealing sober with family, friends and employers can be so intimidating to individuals in recovery that many relapse. Alcohol dependent individuals over the years become extremely skillful in manipulating situations and lying in order to insure a supply of alcohol. The "news" that one has made a commitment to stop drinking is most often met with justifiable skepticism. The individual has probably given the news about stopping the drinking so often that listeners react much as those who heard the warning from "the boy crying wolf". Support from concerned family and friends is essential to recovery, yet the bridge has been burned so badly, that such support is no longer offered.
Alcohol dependent individuals often experience intense isolation and loneliness, even when surrounded by family and friends. Often they do not realize or are in denial as to the impact that their drinking has on the people around them. As with most addicted individuals, alcoholics tend to rely on their own ability to control their addiction. The end result is usually another failed attempt to achieve sobriety. Most individuals seeking help do so only after disastrous events have compelled them to do so. For recovery to become possible, numerous issues as discussed must be addressed. In the end, it is critical for the individual to realize that the help of others is a vital component of recovery.
On December 30, 1994, the United States Food & Drug Administration approved for use in the treatment of alcohol dependence, the opioid antagonist Naltrexone HCI. The approval of naltrexone marked a turning point in the history of treatment for alcohol dependence. Naltrexone is at the forefront of emerging pharmacotherapy protocols utilized by the Pennsylvania Model. Since the approval of naltrexone in 1994, additional medications have been added to the arsenal in the battle against alcohol dependence. These medications include Ondansetron, Campral and Topamax.
Within a few minutes of ingestion, Naltrexone will dramatically reduce or suppress the intense craving to consume alcohol. The medication is extremely safe, has very minor or no side effects, is not addicting either physically or emotionally, can be discontinued at anytime without adverse effects and is generally administered for six months or less.
It is clear neither that Naltrexone, nor any of the other effective medications, in themselves are a cure for alcohol dependence. They are not magic nor are they the silver bullet that will destroy this disease known as alcoholism. They are however, extremely valuable tools, that when properly utilized, will enable motivated individuals to embark upon a successful path to recovery.
The primary difficulty with medications such as Naltrexone is that they only addresse specific issues of a very complicated disease. Naltrexone will effectively suppress the cravings, however it does not address any of the remaining issues for example clinical depression and or social problems which in themselves can cause relapse. It does however create a window of opportunity in which an alcohol dependent individual can address the countless issues of maintaining sobriety, without the overwhelming desire to drink alcohol. Even with the use of naltrexone, the path to recovery is at best difficult.
Alcohol can be compared to a sandbox. Consuming alcohol enables individuals to stick their head in the sand and avoid issues and problems. The problems, the pain, do not go away. They simply lurk in the background, waiting for the individual to attempt to get their head out of the sand. Relapse occurs when the individual is not able to deal with the intense cravings, coupled with their inability to face the almost countless lurking demons that exist in everyday living. Medications effectively take away the sandbox, forcing the individual to address the numerous issues that occur during the recovery process.
Individuals that have "a Life" but cannot get past the cravings in their efforts to abstain from alcohol find Naltrexone "a wonder drug". Generally, within an hour, the monkey that has been on their back for years, jumps off, and does not return if the medication is taken for the recommended period of time. It is rare however for an individual that is alcohol dependent not to have numerous and severe issues which effect recovery. Individuals with more intense issues are far more likely to slip or relapse.
Again, it must remember that the Naltrexone only addresses the cravings. Years of drinking are not washed away by the taking of a pill. Perhaps the most difficult part of recovery is learning how to be happy. Just as the bottom line of a business is profit, the bottom line of recovery is happiness and contentment. The individual must further recognize that happiness and contentment are not always available to us 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. That we have good days and bad days, and that the sandbox is not the answer for the bad days.
Minnesota Model protocols expect failure, over and over, until the individual has bottomed out. Then, out of desperation, the individual is expected to rebuild a life that the bottle took years to destroy. A Pennsylvania Model program does not expect the individual to fail. This does not mean that failures do not occur. The lure of the sandbox and all the lurking demons often overwhelm the individual. However, by properly addressing the Biological, Psychological and Social issues, the sandbox can be filled with concrete, never again to be used in desperation.
Cross-Behavioral And Dual-Behavioral Addiction
Posted on 21 Oct 2008
Reality is that if you have an addiction to one thing the chances are very good that you have other addictions as well. Smoke cigarettes and Gamble? Do Coke and Drink? Very few people have one addiction and one addiction only, they have cross-behavioral addiction or dual-behavioral addiction.
People have mumerous methods of making themselves feel good - otherwise known as cross-addiction or dual-addiction.
Quite often, if you ask someone to give up one addiction - (give up the way they know how to make themselves feel good) they will pick up another addiction almost immediately. They substitute one way of feeling good for another way of feeling good.
Cocaine-induced Brain Plasticity May Protect The Addicted Brain: Findings May Lead To New Drug-abuse Treatments
Posted on 17 Oct 2008
Increased connections among brain cells caused by excessive drug use may represent the body’s defense mechanism to combat addiction and related behaviors, scientists at UT Southwestern Medical Center have concluded.
Previous studies have shown that repeated use of drugs such as cocaine, amphetamines and nicotine increase the number of anatomical structures called dendritic spines in brain regions associated with pleasure and reward. These dendritic spines represent sites where brain cells communicate with one another. Many scientists believe that this long-lasting brain rewiring underlies the similarly persistent behaviors of drug-taking and drug-seeking associated with addiction and relapse. The mechanism that controls this brain rewiring, however, and its relationship to addiction-related behaviors were previously unknown.
In a study appearing in the Aug. 28 issue of Neuron, researchers found that cocaine suppresses the activity of the protein MEF2 in mice. Because MEF2 normally reduces the number of brain connections, suppressing MEF2 leads to an increase in dendritic spine density. The researchers also found that when they enhanced MEF2 activity in the brain this blocked the drug-induced increase in dendritic spine density and increased addiction-related behavioral responses to cocaine.
“Our findings suggest that increased brain connections during chronic drug use may actually limit behavioral changes associated with drug addiction, rather than support them,” said Dr. Christopher Cowan, assistant professor of psychiatry at UT Southwestern and senior author of the study.
Researchers said they hope this finding could lead to a pharmaceutical treatment for addiction.
“Relapse, or the resumption of active drug-taking and drug-seeking, is very common in drug addicts,” Dr. Cowan said. “Addiction-related brain changes and behaviors seem to be hardwired and semipermanent, and there are limited treatment options. Our data suggest that rather than trying to block the process of increasing dendritic spine density, we may actually want to look at treatments that try to enhance this process.”
MEF2 is activated in response to brain activity. It provides negative feedback to eliminate the potential growth of too many communication sites between nerve cells. Repeated exposure to cocaine disrupts this function of MEF2, resulting in new brain connections.
To investigate the relationship between MEF2 and spine-density changes, the researchers varied the level of the protein in an area of the brain called the nucleus accumbens. This region is associated with the feelings of reward that drug addicts seek. Brain imaging done after mice were given cocaine showed that cocaine stopped MEF2 from limiting dendritic spine increases.
To test MEF2’s relationship to behavior, researchers monitored the movement of mice after repeated daily exposure to the same amount of cocaine. This same dose of cocaine produced a larger behavioral response after repeated days of drug injections, resulting in a “sensitized” response. This sensitized behavioral response to the drug is very stable, lasting for many months after the drug is discontinued.
When the researchers manipulated animals so that their MEF2 levels remained high in the presence of cocaine, the animals were more sensitive to the drug. This suggested that increased communication sites might help combat the addiction process.
“This suggests the exciting possibility that MEF2 proteins may control expression of key genes that modulate drug-related brain changes and behavior,” Dr. Cowan said. “If we understand which genes are influenced by MEF2, we can intervene and try to help the system resist or reverse these sensitization processes.”
In 2006, 23.6 million people ages 12 and older needed treatment for drug or alcohol abuse, according to a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration survey. Substance abuse costs the U.S. more than half a trillion dollars annually, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Future research will focus on determining MEF2 target genes and exploring drug-related density changes in other regions of the brain associated with addiction, Dr. Cowan said.
Other UT Southwestern researchers involved in the study were Dr. Suprabha Pulipparacharuvil, instructor of psychiatry; William Renthal, graduate student in psychiatry and neuroscience; Carly Hale, research technician in psychiatry; Dr. Makoto Taniguchi, postdoctoral researcher in psychiatry; Colleen Dewey, graduate student in neuroscience; Dr. Scott Russo, assistant instructor of psychiatry; Dr. Devanjan Sikder, instructor of internal medicine; and Dr. Guanghua Xiao, assistant professor of clinical sciences. Dr. Eric Nestler, former chairman of psychiatry, and former instructor Dr. Arvind Kumar were also involved. Researchers from Yale and Rockefeller University also participated.
The work was funded by the Whitehall Foundation, the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute of Mental Health.
Experience, Science And The Drinking Age
Posted on 13 Oct 2008
Experience, Science And The Drinking Age
Recently more than 100 college presidents surrendered their authority to do something meaningful about campus alcohol abuse by urging policymakers to lower the drinking age from 21 to 18. There has not been so great a "hand-washing" of a significant problem since Pontius Pilate! Thankfully, this group did not include University of Wyoming leadership.
I have a unique perspective on this issue. I was a member of the Wyoming Legislature when it lowered the drinking age to 18 in 1973. In fact I co-sponsored the bill. We argued then, as do these college presidents now, that if you were old enough to go to war (then it was Viet Nam) you were old enough to drink. We railed that the law was not enforced and argued that learning to drink earlier in life would teach responsibility. I was just as wrong then as these college presidents are now.
Two matters have changed my mind since we experimented with a lower drinking age in the 1970s. One is simply that we tried that route and it didn't work. The other is the science and research available today that was not available then.
Any informed discussion must be based in part on our knowledge as state leaders, the experience of local community coalitions, and the extensive literature dedicated to underage drinking. This knowledge, experience, and research all point to an important conclusion: the current 21 year-old drinking age is consistent with human brain development and is an essential component of a comprehensive strategy to advance healthy lifestyles and address the negative consequences of youth alcohol use.
When the U.S. Surgeon General visited Wyoming this spring he noted "adolescence is a time when the developing brain may be particularly susceptible to long-term negative effects from alcohol use." The Surgeon General's research establishes the use of alcohol is a significant health issue for youth as their brains are not fully developed until well into their 20s "creating a significant and extended period during its development of potential exposure to alcohol's harmful effects."
Underage drinking has a devastating impact in this country:
Mortality: It is estimated underage drinking is responsible for the deaths of approximately 5,000 people under the age of 21 each year - including 1,900 deaths from motor vehicle accidents. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found drinking drivers under the age of 21 are involved in fatal crashes at twice the rate of adult drivers.
Student violence: Every year, alcohol is the cause of more than 696,000 assaults and 97,000 instances of sexual assault or date rape among college students. According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 11 percent of students damaged property while under the influence of alcohol.
Academic problems: According to the U.S .Department of Education, alcohol abuse creates academic problems among 25 percent of college students.
Science also proves the earlier a person begins drinking, the more likely he or she is to become a problem drinker.
Among Wyoming youth, binge drinking remains a huge challenge with almost 30 percent of our high school students engaging in this dangerous behavior. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would mean many high school students could legally drink. No doubt some would provide alcohol to their younger classmates, siblings and friends.
The relationship between being "old enough to fight for your country" and being "old enough to drink" is perverse at best. The military may recruit youth partially because of their risk-taking characteristics, but commercial insurance companies also charge them higher premiums for the same reason. The impulsiveness of youth may make a good soldier but it does not mix well with alcohol use.
Gladly, we have made progress in prevention. Studies examining the impact of the minimum legal drinking age reflect a number of positive changes. In 1984, before the drinking age was 21, approximately 8 percent of high school seniors never used alcohol in their lifetime. In 2007, approximately 28 percent of high school seniors never used alcohol in their lifetime. In 1982, when most states still had an 18 year-old drinking age, 60 percent of traffic fatalities were alcohol related. In 2005, that number had declined by more than a third.
Yes, prevention is hard work and continued progress requires college presidents to become engaged. Waving the white flag and returning to a time when young people were allowed to drink legally would be to ignore all we learned from that failed experiment and all that we know now because of science.
by Rodger McDaniel
Wyoming Department of Health deputy director for mental health and substance abuse services
Wyoming Department of Health
<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>
You may contact us using our online form below:
Search
Blog Categories
12 Step (4)Addiction (20)
Addiction Recovery (16)
Addiction Treatment (19)
Alcohol Abuse (16)
Alcohol Detox (11)
Alcohol Rehab (12)
Alcohol Rehab Center (13)
Alcohol Rehabilitation (15)
Alcohol Rehabs (13)
Alcohol Treatment (13)
Alcoholism (15)
Anxiety (8)
California Drug Rehab Centers (8)
Celebrity Rehab (8)
Cocaine Addiction (9)
Crisis Intervention (8)
Depression (6)
Depression Treatment (6)
Detox (9)
Detoxification (11)
Drug Abuse (19)
Drug Addiction (23)
Drug Detox (10)
Drug Rehab (14)
Drug Rehab Center (17)
Drug Rehabilitation (12)
Drug Rehabs (18)
Drug Treatment (22)
Drug Treatment Center (15)
Dual Diagnosis (6)
Eating Disorder (3)
Eating Disorder Treatment (3)
Group Therapy (5)
Intervention (4)
Interventions (7)
Rehab (14)
Rehab Center (14)
Rehab Centers (11)
Sober (10)
Sobriety (13)
Substance Abuse (26)
Substance Abuse Treatment (24)
Quick Links
Alcohol AddictionCocaine Addiction
Prescription Pill Addiction
Methamphetamine Addiction
Heroin Addiction
Marijuana Addiction
Helpful Links
Other Resources
Links:- Alcoholics Anonymous
- AA Orange County
- Narcotics Anonymous
- Cocaine Anonymous
- CA Orange County
- Al-Anon/Alateen
- Al-Anon Orange County
- HOW Hall Huntington Beach
Telephone Numbers:
- AA Orange County:
(714) 556-4555
- NA Orange County:
(714) 776-8581
- CA Orange County:
(949) 650-1011
- Al-Anon Orange County:
(714) 748-1113
Add URL Free Directory
New York DUI
Here at DUIFoundation.org, we hope to reinforce the ideal that a single drunk driving accident can permanently have a negative impact on you, passengers in your vehicle, and anyone else involved in the disaster (drivers and passengers in other automobiles and even pedestrians)






